
There is a different kind of populism emerging, one required by the necessity of impending ecological disaster. I don't think the sky will fall, but the oil companies will keep gouging you at the pump. In the big cities (and even the small ones), there are too many people and each one of them has a car; put them all on the street at the same time and you have a transportation system that no longer works. People sit on the freeways in L.A. at rush hour, moving at 5 to 15 miles per hour (if they're lucky), complaining about the situation, burning expensive gas while idling in the fast lane: None of them will admit that the system has failed, fails daily, and none of them would consider the alternative of mass transit.

Mass transit takes too much time. It's too crowded. It's too dangerous. It's smelly: There is a list of reasons why not to take mass transit even now, when it can transport faster than a private vehicle during rush hours in cities.
But it's obvious, at least in Los Angeles, that the answer is not more lanes of traffic. The answer is effective mass transit that doesn't rely on the same transit corridors that automobiles use. Light rail, subway, even monorail would be an effective alternative...IS an effective alternative. I take it each workday from Pasadena to the Wilshire Miracle Mile. It's a round trip of more than 20 miles and takes less than an hour...until I have to climb on a bus and get into traffic for the last three miles, which adds another 20 minutes to my commute.
My transportation cost is $62 a month, and I put less than 3,000 miles a YEAR on my car. I fill the tank once every five to seven weeks.
Electric-powered mass transit is a real solution for the future. Ride the train soon.
(Was that fucking boring or what?)
No comments:
Post a Comment